🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions about the comments delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer following the Serbian champion's victory over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is American – and sports frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

We all love a storyline, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has never defeated in an official match. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, versus him Fritz had dropped 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven grand slams (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in press after the loss that he in fact preferred his path, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three players in the world back-to-back. He is more than justified to aim for the achievement; an competitor is supposed to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

The American, twenty-eight, is placed number four in the global rankings starting the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that is as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His elite delivery and concussive power on both front side and backhand are more than adequate to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently helpless. The last several seasons has seen the curious rise of lanky, towering players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his limbs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe limitation on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, improbable advancements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years after, he was sniffing the elite ten. The previous season, he suddenly exploded up to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a legitimate contender to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing slump of US male players winning grand slams when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's play in that very quarter-final ought to have been sufficient of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for moments towards the very end, when Fritz had survived a few match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked evenly matched during the rallies, with Fritz earning plenty of chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the brink of frustration. When he finally did convert a single of the chances at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he promptly produced a horrendous game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to use excessive energy to win it. Down match points in the last game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his backup delivery, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a result of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite compelling evidence that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the next round and never particularly seem like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – the Serbian is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, thoughtful voice in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for Daniil Medvedev, willing to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed determined a match, but explain it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for America not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick feels unjust. (Since Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the standings, perhaps they can divide that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

American legend Division

• The Spanish phenom
• The American contender
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I’d probably dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to do it,” Fritz informed a journalist in the summer of claiming a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t fulfill that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely improbable for everybody else. {