🔗 Share this article

Ken Burns has become more than a filmmaker; he is a brand, a prolific creative force. With each new television endeavor heading for the small screen, all desire his attention.

The filmmaker completed “countless podcast appearances”, he says, wrapping up of his marathon promotional journey comprising 40 cities, numerous film showings and hundreds of interviews. “With podcasts numbering in the hundreds of millions, I feel I’ve participated in a substantial portion.”

Happily Burns possesses boundless energy, equally articulate in interviews as he is prolific while filmmaking. The veteran director has gone everywhere from prestigious venues to mainstream media outlets to discuss his latest monumental work: his Revolutionary War documentary, a comprehensive multi-part historical examination that consumed the past decade of his life and arrived currently on public television.

Defiantly Traditional Approach

Similar to traditional cooking in an age of fast food, this documentary series is defiantly traditional, evoking memories of The World at War rather than contemporary online content and podcast series.

However, for the filmmaker, whose professional life documenting American historical narratives including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, its origin story is not just another subject but essential. “As I mentioned to directing partner Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: we won’t work on a more important film Burns contemplates from his New York base.

Extensive Historical Investigation

Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward utilized numerous historical volumes and other historical materials. Dozens of historians, spanning age and perspective, contributed scholarly insights in conjunction with distinguished researchers from a range of other fields like African American history, first nations scholarship plus colonial history.

Signature Documentary Style

The style of the series will feel familiar to viewers of Burns’ earlier work. The unique approach featured methodical photographic exploration across still photos, extensive employment of contemporary scores with performers interpreting primary sources.

This period represented Burns established his reputation; a generation later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he can apparently summon numerous talented actors. Collaborating with the filmmaker during a recent appearance, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “When Ken Burns calls, you say ‘Yes.’”

All-Star Cast

The decade-long production schedule provided advantages in terms of flexibility. Recordings took place at professional facilities, on location and remotely via Zoom, a method utilized throughout the health crisis. Burns recounts working with Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours while in Georgia to voice his character as George Washington then continuing to his next engagement.

Additional performers feature multiple distinguished artists, respected performing veterans, diverse creative professionals, Tom Hanks, Ethan Hawke, Maya Hawke, Samuel L Jackson, Michael Keaton, Tracy Letts, international acting community, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, television and film stars, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

Burns emphasizes: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast gathered for any production. Their contributions are remarkable. They’re not picked because they’re celebrities. It irritated me when questioned, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They’re the finest actors in the world and they can bring this stuff alive.”

Nuanced Narrative

Nevertheless, no contemporary observers remain, modern media forced Burns and his team to lean heavily on primary texts, integrating personal accounts of multiple revolutionary participants. This methodology permitted to show spectators not only to the “bold-faced names” of the revolution along with multiple essential to the narrative, many of whom lack visual representation.

Burns also indulged his individual interest for maps and spatial representation. “I love maps,” he comments, “featuring increased geographical representation in this film than in all the other films throughout my entire career.”

International Impact

The team filmed at nearly a hundred historical locations throughout the continent and British sites to capture the landscape’s character and partnered extensively with living history participants. Various aspects converge to tell a story more brutal, complicated and internationally important versus conventional understanding.

The film maintains, represented more than local dispute about property, revenue and governance. Instead the film portrays a violent confrontation that ultimately drew in multiple global powers and unexpectedly manifested described as “humanity’s highest ideals”.

Civil War Reality

Early dissatisfaction and objections leveled at London by far-flung British subjects across thirteen rebellious territories soon descended into a brutal civil conflict, pitting family members against each other and creating local enmities. During the second installment, academic Alan Taylor comments: “The greatest misconception concerning independence struggle is that it was something a unifying experience for colonists. It leaves out the reality that Americans fought each other.”

Historical Complexity

In his view, the independence account that “typically is drowning in sentimentality and nostalgia and is incredibly superficial and insufficiently honors actual events, and all the participants and the incredible violence of it.

It was, he contends, an uprising that declared the revolutionary principle of the unalienable rights of people; a bloody domestic struggle, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; and a global war, another installment in a sequence of struggles among European powers for the “prize of North America”.

Contingent Historical Events

Burns also wanted {to rediscover the