🔗 Share this article

The acclaimed actor is likely the perfect pick for a bold horror film centered on Jesus Christ, though not for the motivations certain viewers may think. Truthfully, Cage does not even act as Jesus in The Carpenter’s Son: his role is referred to only as The Carpenter. He is positioned as the Joseph of this narrative, attempting to keep his beliefs as The Boy (portrayed by Noah Jupe), his adolescent adopted son, starts to exhibit supernatural abilities. Why it's challenging to picture another major actor in this role is that even as his character becomes weighed down with numerous challenges, the actor looks practically touchingly convinced that the dark, bleak little movie is worth his time.

The Actor's Current Career Choices

Nicolas Cage was allocating that time more judiciously recently. He still does more films than the majority of casual fans may ever watch — for example, are you aware that the man has completed a trio of distinct Westerns recently? — however he also adds esteemed independent films such as Dream Scenario, Pig, and a further title. This new film seems like in that category, because it’s borderline horror, potentially provocative, and handles a campy-sounding premise with gravity.

Movie's Storyline and Handling

Regrettably, writer-director Lotfy Nathan does not justify that serious attention. The film starts from a interestingly wandering place, marketed as drawing from an obscure religious text regarding the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their son relocate frequently, anxious of faith-based hostility or suspicion about their son's mysterious gifts. “Calamity follows us,” Cage sadly observes. This persists as dark forces focus on them in their latest settlement, beginning on that familiar Biblical temptation for the youth.

Occasionally, the movie resembles an Exorcist-style horror film, but none of the main figures are clearly inhabited. Instead, they grow increasingly alienated mutually, as these powers influence a resident female (Isla Johnston, listed as an outsider) that The Boy forms a relationship with, and provides all troubling visions of a dark tomorrow. The Carpenter especially grapples with his role within the plot, at times berating his child he can’t fully understand.

Debate and Care

The subject matter is apt to invite debate, and Nathan treats it with plenty of care — too much, perhaps. The idea of a young man dealing with his future martyrdom and seduced by unknown powers is indeed frightening, but Nathan could be hesitant regarding seeming gratuitous and anxious to signal his aims, so he often withdraws to darkly ominous cinematography. The roles constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who demonstrated notable talent in the 2024 Crow remake, interestingly — surrenders her acting to her character's costume, sometimes broken up by several gnarly horror imagery.

Cage's Portrayal and Movie's Flaws

Meanwhile, the actor toy with exactly the kind of exaggerated performance that his ironic fans may desire. An instance (featured) in the trailer in which he loses control and shouts “I’ve lost my faith!” When this sort of florid outburst is a component of your Jesus-themed horror movie, possibly a more boldly ridiculous method would be more effective of his eagerness to go over the top as required. Rather, the film echoes the weaker direct-to-video films Cage made over that period — not the cheesy thrillers so much as the serious stories and supernatural thrillers that typically appear interesting, and often contain several notable actor's highlights, but in the end seem like, frankly, cheap home video fare.

Frankly, some of those, although simpler, were more entertaining overall. At this point I must break my personal rule, not faith-based but professional: Previously, a respected mentor urged me to banish descriptive terms like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my analytical lexicon. These words communicate minimal but a individual and generically described lack of patience, disengaging from the job of clearly expressing the thoughtful and feeling of watching a specific film. It’s difficult to express tedium without seeming uninteresting oneself. It's just as unclear as terming a movie “notable.” “Elaborate,” that is.

But I must confess, I was bored throughout the film. To the movie’s non-exploitative credit, it is a religious style of boredom, not because The Carpenter’s Son is lecturing, but since it demands a type of obedient endurance to sit through it. Eventually early on, this feature locks into a cyclic tempo of simmering distress, and fails to