🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. This production, though, may align too neatly with the mythologized version circulated by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's entertainment industry have worked together to forge a made-to-measure persona of Putin. This figure is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

One recent example is a TV series released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” the nation from disorder. While he is called Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up buttressing this identical story instead of undercutting it. A new film inspired by a popular book sets out to subvert the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the political machinery surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is shown as having been picked by influential figures to stabilise the nation because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and practically plead him to take the top job. His response is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, seeking permanent power.

This narrative is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody ever begged him to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who planned to control the state de facto.

• His list included several politicians, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to a journalist who studied his rise, the future president simply fitted the required parameters: obedient, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman close to the process stated the key criterion was controllability and loyalty, not strength.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the notion of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “007” may in part have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. The grittier interpretation led Russian media and social media to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images swapping the actor's likeness with his surfaced on Moscow streets, fueling the increasing trend to frame him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with viewers there, the Kremlin will not miss the opportunity to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of public dissent, the political rivals, or prominent activists in the story, despite covering the past decade, is a pleasant bonus for official messaging.

Domestically, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears directly. He is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he finally acquires a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it might seek to question.